Hans van Temsche recently had to appear in court again, he is involved in a case concerning the recognition of his alleged son. His ex wants to enforce a paternity test and therefore opted for a subpoena. It concerns Ruth A., who wants to ensure that Temsche gets to know his son and her son gets the chance to build a bond with his alleged father. Ruth says she is sure that the child is Van Temsche’s, a ‘paternity test‘ should make that clear, according to her.
No acknowledgment of child
“I want my son to know who his father is. I am sure that is Hans, but he refuses to recognize the child,” said Ruth in Het Laatste Nieuws. The woman indicates that she has known Van Temsche since her school days, when they were classmates. She subsequently visited him several times after being convicted of the murders of 2-year-old toddler Luna and 24-year-old nanny Oulematou. During one of those visits, the young woman is said to have become pregnant by the killer. At the moment he doesn’t want to acknowledge his child, Ruth wants to force a paternity test to clarify things once and for all.
Summons to enforce paternity test
According to Ruth, the summons must enforce a paternity test, the DNA test can clarify the case and ensure a reliable result. If it turns out that Hans van Temsche is the father, he will have to acknowledge the paternity. This can then have consequences for, for example, the alimony that he has to pay, so that Ruth can also benefit financially.